4 ms·
The answer is no. The problem is, is that we don't trim the neural networks of their spurious connections and instead we're stuck staring at these fully (visual
by rdlecler1 10y ago
The answer is no. The problem is, is that we don't trim the neural networks of their spurious connections and instead we're stuck staring at these fully (visually) connected layered networks.
Once you start to trim out the spurious connections you start to see that you are left with a logic design with integration/threshold circuits instead of straight binary circuits that we're used to seeing. There are even certain universal network patterns what will emerge to perform different functions just like in binary circuit design.
I wrote a paper about this in 2008 that's now been cited about 150 times. It's using Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks instead of Artificial Neural Networks, but the math is the same and the principle still holds:
http://m.msb.embopress.org/content/4/1/213.abstract http://m.msb.embopress.org/content/4/1/213.abstract
- phaedrus 10y agoAround 2006 - 2008 I participated in a Research Experiences for Undergraduates program at an AI lab. I used to get into arguments with grad students when I asserted it was intuitively obvious that given a neural network which recognizes two features, it should be possible to extract a trimmed network which recognizes one feature but not the other.