3 ms·
You chose rather dense European countries for your example. Sweden has 21 people/km^2, Norway and Finland has 16 people/km^2. Both have working public transport
by xorcist 10y ago
You chose rather dense European countries for your example. Sweden has 21 people/km^2, Norway and Finland has 16 people/km^2. Both have working public transport. Which should show that the average population density of the country as a whole is mostly irrelevant.
- sokoloff 10y agoYes, I chose rather dense countries, but I also chose countries where I've found that having a car is more of a liability than an asset. That's a rough metric I use for "is the rail and public transport system good?" Did I choose dense countries and declare that they had good public transport, or did I choose countries with good public transport and discover they were dense? I've never been to Scandinavia, so I have no experience to fairly judge.