> Also, you want "logarithmic," not "logistic." Don't think so - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_functio

> Also, you want "logarithmic," not "logistic." Don't think so - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function The 'S' curve of logistic growth looks exponential for a while, which is why the question arises. By contrast, no one mistakes logarithmic growth for exponential growth for very long.