3 ms·
He was half-wrong about the specific methods used (I say half-wrong because half of AlphaGo relies on relatively-brute-force MCTS). I don't think this detracts
by argonaut 10y ago
He was half-wrong about the specific methods used (I say half-wrong because half of AlphaGo relies on relatively-brute-force MCTS). I don't think this detracts from my point - it is hard for any researcher to predict the exact methods that will be used a decade from now.
- ThomPete 10y agoYou don't have a point. You tried to use one expert as a refutation of my claim that there was a general consensus with how long it would take for computers to beat a human in Go. A simple search on google will provide you with plenty of writing backing that sentiment up. Asking any of your friends who took AI classes back then would confirm the same.