Are people maybe confusing this guy with Guccifer 2.0? What crimes was he exposing when he posted George W's paintings online? My understanding was that the pri

Are people maybe confusing this guy with Guccifer 2.0? What crimes was he exposing when he posted George W's paintings online? My understanding was that the private email server was only revealed incidentally to the material he released, when a reporter noticed a questionable email address. Even accounting for the importance of transparency, it seems weird for the GP to assert this guy didn't deserve "even four months" when a large number of the times he accessed accounts were with no noble intent but with clear maliciousness