3 ms·
I guess it depends on your use case but just about everyone I know uses Vagrant. It's true that you should never upgrade VirtualBox or Vagrant anywhere near a d
by blowski 10y ago
I guess it depends on your use case but just about everyone I know uses Vagrant. It's true that you should never upgrade VirtualBox or Vagrant anywhere near a deadline, but I rarely have problems. I get similar performance from both VirtualBox and Parallels, both on network shares and execution. I'm on a 2014 MacBook Pro, Ubuntu guests, mostly doing PHP and Node.
- jacobsenscott 10y agoThat's interesting that you get the same performance on vbox and parallels. I tested vbox, vmware, and parallels on a macbook pro (2011 or 2012). vbox was an order of magnitude slower running our unit tests (and rails tests are slow enough as it is). Parallels was the fastest running the tests at close to native speed. Vmware was okay, but not great.
- spdionis 10y agoDid you use network shares or default shared filesystem?
- blowski 10y agoI was using NFS - the default VirtualBox Shared Folders is slow as to be useless (which I guess is what you were going to say). But on NFS (which is recommended by Vagrant) I had no problems.
- jacobsenscott 10y agoPretty sure I ran all my tests using nfs.