3 ms·
"A dangerously close analog to the "nothing to hide"[0] argument." No, it really isn't. The idea that a company that is complying would walk away because those
by st3v3r 10y ago
"A dangerously close analog to the "nothing to hide"[0] argument."
No, it really isn't. The idea that a company that is complying would walk away because those that aren't are gone after is foolish. It's like saying a freelancer shouldn't pursue people who stiff them on payment, because other potential clients might hear about it, and choose not to hire them.
- taeric 10y agoOf course, a freelancer who has a healthy practice and good relationship with many clients can and likely will lose some clients if they take a publicly aggressive stance with other clients. And, be clear, egregious violations aren't the concern. The concern is if you see a freelancer constantly partaking of expensive or just annoying audits on good faith partners. It can drive folks away. This is why the lines are drawn at 95/5. If it were actually the other direction, things would be different.