4 ms·
> If Apple was similarly accused of wrongdoing by the IRS, and told to backpay taxes that they were supposed to have paid, would you still feel similarly? But
by objclxt 10y ago
> If Apple was similarly accused of wrongdoing by the IRS, and told to backpay taxes that they were supposed to have paid, would you still feel similarly?
But that's not what's happening, really. If as an individual the IRS wrote to you and said "look, all your tax returns in previous years were in compliance with the law, but we've now decided those laws were wrong and you owe us more money" you might understandably be a little annoyed.
There's a reason that in most (but not all) cases we don't allow new laws to be retroactively applied - because we recognize it to be unfair.
- lhopki01 10y agoIt's not a new law.
- Nursie 10y agoThat's not what really happened here though - the court found that they were in contravention of existing law all along. It's not a change in law or retroactive application of new law.
- pjc50 10y agoThe proper US analogy would be some sort of state level tax break that was later declared unconstitutional and the tax refund you got having to be repaid.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]