3 ms·
The UK's continuing contempt for the unanimous ruling of the ECHR in Hirst v United Kingdom would be one good point. Likewise the continued push for mass surve
by M2Ys4U 10y ago
The UK's continuing contempt for the unanimous ruling of the ECHR in Hirst v United Kingdom would be one good point.
Likewise the continued push for mass surveillance (see: DRIPA, the defunct Draft Communications Data Bill and the seemingly inevitable Investigatory Powers Bill) is another - the most recent legislative attempts have been to make legal what the state has been doing illegally for many, many years. What worries me is that there is no common-law right to privacy in English law; our modern privacy rights stem almost exclusively from the ECHR and the EU.
The recent clampdown on the rights of trades unions is a third example. Despite an historic low number of days lost to industrial action, the government has been making it much harder to legally strike, or even to _fund_ trades unions (for example, imposing high thresholds on ballots and attempting to remove the option of payroll funding for union membership).