4 ms·
I guess C# in depth by Jon Skeet would be the obvious answer. Any language would be happy to have such a useful historical guide to best practice. I'm not reall
by thorin 10y ago
I guess C# in depth by Jon Skeet would be the obvious answer. Any language would be happy to have such a useful historical guide to best practice. I'm not really a c# dev although I do use it a fair bit and I thought it was excellent.
http://csharpindepth.com/ http://csharpindepth.com/
- romanovcode 10y agoI am probably outliner but I really didn't get the book at all. There is much intensive talk about differences between every version from 2.0 to 5.0, how you do same thing in 2.0, then in 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0. I really don't get why I would need to know the difference between them unless my job involves maintaining super old systems. (Which is quite common). However for me personally it was not a good book at all because for me personally that information was completely useless.
- hyeomans 10y agoFeel the same, usually when I want to refresh how something became to be I go back and read it. Do you have any good practical book under your belt?