3 ms·
That was (very clearly) sarcasm.
by 35bge57dtjku 10y ago
That was (very clearly) sarcasm.
- aninhumer 10y agoYes, but sarcasm that I at least would interpret to mean: "Your argument is calling for a halt to progress, which is as silly as going back to using horses." But the parent wasn't actually suggesting that progress be stopped, merely observing that it was going to cause social problems.