4 ms·
Does it support encryption yet? Also, you'd have to auto-pin all your files, or risk losing them. I think GlusterFS (battle-proof, but file-wise and assumes an
by espadrine 10y ago
Does it support encryption yet? Also, you'd have to auto-pin all your files, or risk losing them.
I think GlusterFS (battle-proof, but file-wise and assumes an administrator with access to everything) assumes or infinit.sh (robust ACL, but young, not open-source) better addresses those use-cases.
- diggan 10y agoEncrypt the files before adding to IPFS and then decrypt after receiving them. Support for encryption will be built-in into IPFS in the future but for now, this solution works. There is a issue tracking this here: https://github.com/ipfs/faq/issues/6 https://github.com/ipfs/faq/issues/6 Also, when adding files yourself, those files become pinned by the default. Getting files won't pin automatically however. You have some more information about pinning here: https://github.com/ipfs/examples/tree/master/examples/pinning https://github.com/ipfs/examples/tree/master/examples/pinnin...
- espadrine 10y agoAh, good to know. Still, you end up having to develop your own ACL system if you have multiple users (eg. family). Especially, shared directories are tricky.
- fizzbatter 10y agoI was actually thinking of using a custom network, not truly IPFS.