3 ms·
Yes, textbook pricing is totally out of whack. Also, the need to legitimize the higher sticker prices forces publishers to make books that are bloated, repetiti
by ivan_ah 10y ago
Yes, textbook pricing is totally out of whack. Also, the need to legitimize the higher sticker prices forces publishers to make books that are bloated, repetitive, and waaay too long. Who has time to read 1000+ pages? The textbook racket and bad quality of explanations is precisely why I started a publishing company: we make science textbooks that don't suck.
[1] No bullshit guide to math & physics => http://www.lulu.com/shop/ivan-savov/no-bullshit-guide-to-math-and-physics/paperback/product-22839889.html http://www.lulu.com/shop/ivan-savov/no-bullshit-guide-to-mat... (recently released v5.1)
[2] No bullshit guide to linear algebra => http://gum.co/noBSLA http://gum.co/noBSLA
There are also really good free books out there, with my favourite "gems" being really old books like this one on basic math https://www.gutenberg.org/files/41568/41568-pdf.pdf#page=3 https://www.gutenberg.org/files/41568/41568-pdf.pdf#page=3 and this one on calculus http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf#page=3 http://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf#page=3 The calculus book is tiny, yet it covers the same material as a mainstream calculus book.
- whorleater 10y agoI realize this is self promotion for your textbook company (who's goals I laud! Acessible knowledge is a good thing), but the idea that a text book is "too long" is...odd. I've never been expected to read a textbook cover to cover before, and all the extra content a textbook has makes it a remarkable resource for referencing even after the class has finished. While the basics of knowledge can be disseminated in far fewer pages, the upsides of having extra examples and asides in a textbook pretty easily outweighs the downsides (unless you count pricing).
- ivan_ah 10y agoI agree that examples and asides are useful. What I had in mind is certain chapters in physics or math books that are fully boil down to one equation, but somehow end up stretching the narrative out to fill dozens of pages. Just the other day I was looking for the statement of Stokes theorem in a mainstream calculus textbook, and fell upon two special formulations, one 'outline' of a derivation, before finally finding the theorem. Even though I knew exactly what I was looking for it took me minutes. What would a student remember from this chapter? A much better structure would be to state the Stokes' theorem upfront and then give a few examples, and maybe show the derivation, then end the chapter. Short and sweet; something the reader will remember.
- tamana 10y agoYou can skim of its too easy. Another student can't conjure more detail if it is too hard.
- tbihl 10y agoI'm guessing the value of concise texts depends upon your learning style. Personally, I like to read beforehand and mull over topics so that I can engage my professor in class, rather than just trying to keep up. This would be extremely helpful to me, because I tend to become frustrated when I see unrealistically long reading assignments, and then I abandon the way that works best for me. I was recently assigned to review three 600-page references before a two-hour lab; when that happens, I stop reading altogether. I know that that's far beyond what would happen with inflated textbook chapters, but it is similar. My fiancée, on the other hand, does her reading afterwards. She goes to class to see what the professor cares about, and then looks for those areas and reads about them. She probably doesn't mind long texts at all (I'll have to ask her.)