3 ms·
Wow another blow to Theranos. I'm surprised they are still in business. On another note, someone in the wsj seems to really hold a grudge against Theranos and/
by dhruvrrp 10y ago
Wow another blow to Theranos. I'm surprised they are still in business.
On another note, someone in the wsj seems to really hold a grudge against Theranos and/or Elizabeth Holmes.
Edit: Warren to Holmes mb
- minimaxir 10y agoThere's a big difference between a grudge and a where-there's-smoke-there's-fire scenario.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- bsder 10y ago> On another note, someone is the wsj seems to really hold a grudge against Theranos and/or Elizabeth Holmes. I suspect because they were, at one point, on the receiving end of her wrath. She strikes me as a Carly Fiorina, Jr., and not even remotely above pulling some contacts to exert some backhanded political pressure on people she doesn't like. Not all reporters are idiots. And some of the reporters who cover specific areas are pretty close to experts in their own right. If you try to feed them a line of bull, they're going to smoke you. The relevant line is: “Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel”
- sseveran 10y agoI don't think there needs to be malice here. They do need to sell newspapers and Theranos cultivated a high profile media image so people are interested in them.