4 ms·
Could be upsides to that, but cranking up the global food requirements (remember, a muscular body requires a lot more energy to maintain) would be a negative.
by sliverstorm 10y ago
Could be upsides to that, but cranking up the global food requirements (remember, a muscular body requires a lot more energy to maintain) would be a negative.
Also, what's optimal? Your body adapts to what you are doing, something we take for granted today. E.g. If you like bicycling, a permanent linebacker build may be undesirable.
It would probably be more ideal to set some kind of fitness "floor", rather than remove the mechanism completely.
- guard-of-terra 10y agoMost people already eat much more than they need, might as well make use of those calories. Of course there should be a "floor", we don't want to grow into blobs of slithering muscles and veins, just well-built.