> Yes? How is this even a question? A company paid them in the form of an outfit for the sole purpose of having it be seen. There is no interpretation of this s

> Yes? How is this even a question? A company paid them in the form of an outfit for the sole purpose of having it be seen. There is no interpretation of this situation where it's not an ad. Well, except real life, where we need to work with facts instead of idealism. Nobody is denying it's an ad, I'm denying that it's possible to eradicate product placement. This is not a new problem for Instagram, it's a fact of life that we have always dealt with.