4 ms·
Why not? Rigid adherence to rules without consideration of what's going on doesn't usually end up with a better place.
by NegativeK 10y ago
Why not?
Rigid adherence to rules without consideration of what's going on doesn't usually end up with a better place.
- zepto 10y agoYou seem to be advocating that those in positions of power shouldn't have to adhere to the rules. That doesn't usually end up with a better place.
- smcl 10y agoThat's obviously not what the parent post meant and you know it
- zepto 10y agoActually, it's not obvious at all. The parent is suggesting that the EU should not adhere tax law as written and should instead attempt to impose it's morality.
- NegativeK 10y agoI'm advocating that Apple bone up and pay taxes, even if there's a way out.
- zepto 10y agoThey do pay taxes. You are advocating that they should pay taxes that they don't owe because an EU bureaucrat wants to increase the power of the EU against the sovereignty of the individual states, in this case Ireland.