3 ms·
If we have always been lazy, why is there now an obesity epidemic? It seems to me that means the cause of obesity lies elsewhere.
by BasLeijdekkers 10y ago
If we have always been lazy, why is there now an obesity epidemic? It seems to me that means the cause of obesity lies elsewhere.
- cpr 10y agoOne of the likely contributors is the unhealthy long-chain long-shelf-life fats of most prepared foods, which didn't arrive until the 30's and 40's. Given that most people don't make the time to make fresh meals from scratch, they're getting fairly unhealthy food even if they cook at home. (And many folks short-cut with fast-food options, which are usually worse.)
- herval 10y agoAll other things equal, I imagine people used to eat a lot less calorie-dense food...?
- tree_of_item 10y agoBecause we haven't always been sedentary. I thought the article covered this point pretty early on.
- Avshalom 10y agoWe were poorer, less healthy, shorter and no one was actually measuring obesity.
- Jtsummers 10y agoPrior to the 20th century (depending on where you live, but this is for the areas hit with obesity epidemics): 1. You had to walk most places (often miles a day). 2. You had to physically labor. Most people didn't have desk jobs or the period's equivalent. 3. Food was relatively scarce, and harder to transport. 4. Social activities (we are social creatures) required physical effort (walking to, dancing, walking around). We can now be social while being remarkably physically passive. 5. Entertainment options were more scarce, so boredom meant you did something. Now, you can entertain yourself by sitting on a couch or at the desk playing a video game or watching a movie. You could make a case for books being similarly physically passive, but that requires widespread literacy and access to books which wasn't true of the general population.
- tbihl 10y agoThis also tracks with lower obesity rates in cities and other places where walking is a fact of life. I didn't actually think there was anything informative about the article. It was just a prominent name stuck on what we already knew intuitively.
- Finnucane 10y agoThe expansion of ranching and farming in the great plains of the Americas was sufficiently bountiful to lead to the first 'health food' crazes of the early 20th century--more people had enough to eat, and increasing automation was already reducing labor. So the roots of our current problem were already being planted, as it were. But in the last 30-40 years, there's been a noticeable uptick in average caloric consumption, even more reduced activity, and more of those calories (at least in the US) coming from processed foods with ever-larger quantities of sugar.
- Floegipoky 10y agoYou left out probably the biggest culprit- modern, highly-processed foods
- kazinator 10y ago> 3. Food was relatively scarce, and harder to transport. Plus: no refrigeration.
- mmanfrin 10y agoDo you think a hundred years ago you'd be employed as a programmer, sitting at a desk?
- kazinator 10y agoPollution must have something to do with it. Everyone has some level of dioxins, lead and other crap in their cells. It's not just obesity; people were more fertile. Men had much higher sperm counts 100 years ago.
- Bakary 10y agoFor having lived in several Asian and European countries, I can claim on the basis of anecdotal life experience that it has a lot to do with the local culture. When I first came to America I was (and still am) shocked by the way people related to food and the ease with which you could fall in a sedentary lifestyle.