3 ms·
> Compared with markdown, drool is minimal without signals like [ or !. drool will not make a literary article look like programming codes. looks at demo scree
by SamBam 10y ago
> Compared with markdown, drool is minimal without signals like [ or !. drool will not make a literary article look like programming codes.
looks at demo screenshot
> There is @@a link to @@./demo.webp https://www.google.com/ncr https://www.google.com/ncr
- dou4cc 10y agoThe link content is "a link to @@./demo.webp". "@@./demo.webp" is a picture. Is drool not minimal enough?
- SamBam 10y agoThe content is exactly as I posted it above. There is an @@ before "a link". I was just saying that this seemed exactly as arbitrary as "[", which is what drool said it was avoiding.