4 ms·
Man the cognitive dissonance in your post is hilarious. >We have sent free food to celebrities during special occasions (not money, but the equivalent is easy
by valarauca1 10y ago
Man the cognitive dissonance in your post is hilarious.
>We have sent free food to celebrities during special occasions (not money, but the equivalent is easy to make);
>this corporation cares about food a lot. More than money… Well, the two are fungible.
What are you even trying to argue about? You admit your core argument is flawed every time you state it. It is like you don't even believe what you are posting about.
- bertil 10y agoIn the two examples you quote, I am saying that money is easily changeable into food. The reverse is actually not true (which is why there is a lot of food waste and charities handle redistributing some of it). I’m missing the cognitive dissonance. We’ve surprised hungry people with food at an opportune moment, not money. If you want a clearer discussion on the distinction, Dan Ariely has a great explanation on paying his mother-in-law for diner. I’d be happy to quote Amartya Sen or Kahneman on the same topic if you want a clearer explanation.