3 ms·
> Companies are already taxed on their profits In theory. We are having this debate because in practice some are taxed at 20% and others practically nil. I'm
by noir-york 10y ago
> Companies are already taxed on their profits
In theory.
We are having this debate because in practice some are taxed at 20% and others practically nil.
I'm arguing for no negotiated tax arrangements, indeed I have been giving thought to a progressive tax regime for companies. That would be interesting to evaluate.
> And share buybacks are returning capital to the owners of the business
Which is why I am not sure buy backs should be taxed. Either a company invests its earnings, or else it returns them to shareholders who can decide to identify growth opportunities, as you suggest.
- makomk 10y agoCompanies like Apple achieved a tax rate of almost zero by exploiting the definition of "profits" to argue that they didn't earn more than a trivial amount of profits in any of the countries they operated in. The definition is the problem here.