Well this is specifically for high-crime neighborhoods. I would accept less privacy and more policing in high-crime neighborhoods because that reduces the incen

Well this is specifically for high-crime neighborhoods. I would accept less privacy and more policing in high-crime neighborhoods because that reduces the incentives of crime as the perpetrator would be more likely to be caught. When you're talking about marginal benefit (crime rate from 2/100,000 -> 1/100,000), I would be less willing to give up liberties. There is some tipping point, and we can argue where that is, but I still believe in the value of old-fashioned policing to get us to an acceptable risk