4 ms·
First reaction: Congrats, looks great! Second reaction: Yet another, completely different syntax highlighting implementation/definition list... https://github.
by scrollaway 10y ago
First reaction: Congrats, looks great!
Second reaction: Yet another, completely different syntax highlighting implementation/definition list... https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/tree/master/runtime/syntax https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/tree/master/runtime/syntax
Couldn't pick any of the hundreds that already exist? :(
- anilgulecha 10y agoLooks like these are just nanorc files. so reusing nano's definitions? The project name also checks out.
- scrollaway 10y agoThey look similar, but definitely not the same: https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/blob/master/runtime/syntax/csharp.micro https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/blob/master/runtime/syntax... https://github.com/nanorc/nanorc/blob/master/csharp.nanorc https://github.com/nanorc/nanorc/blob/master/csharp.nanorc Looks like they were s&r'd. Which kind of makes the case: why not just make it compatible with nanorc? (Or anything else really, just, something that doesn't create yet-another uncountable set of syntax highlighting files that has to be maintained to support just one more editor)
- z3t4 10y agoWhat is the best syntax highlighting implementation/definition format out there ?