3 ms·
Let me quote Einstein: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but NOT simpler!" And that's IMHO exactly where the original author erred. But i find
by donrodriguez 10y ago
Let me quote Einstein: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but NOT simpler!"
And that's IMHO exactly where the original author erred. But i find his musings so incredibly funny and enlightening, that i will use them as a future reference of how NOT to do an analysis.
He didn't just do an apple vs oranges comparison, but he essentially threw eggs, potatoes and ham in the mix and tried to deduce an universal law from his concoction by sprinkling some quantum mechanics fairy dust into the mix! Hilarious!
Just by simply looking at his sloppy graph (Typical origin-shenanigans are often a dead give away for the quality of an examination.) one should be able to recognize the form of an underlying step function, as expected from a multi-layered memory system (L1,L2,L3,RAM, ...) .
But NO, he envisions a Square-Root function, just by arbitrarly placing a line in a logarithmic coordinate system. WTF?! Where is the fitting? And how does he defend his conclusion? drum-roll QUANTUM MECHANICS .... Muhahahaha! Great show!
So essentially it's not cost that prohibits our brave engineers of increasing L1 cache size ad infinitum, but because of quantum mechanics! Muhahahaha! Stop it, my stomach hurts.....
- angry_octet 10y agoI love that you have had the foresight to create throwaway accounts and leave them for a year before using them to be insulting and indulging in pointless theatrics.
- donrodriguez 10y agoI'm sorry, that you feel that way, but instead of criticizing me as "insulting" and "indulging" in "pointless theatrics" maybe you could explain how and why his argument of "Myth of Ram" and O(√N) holds any merit. Just by looking at his graphs you could argue, if it's about RAM he should just look at the the part from 10MB to 8G, which shows an almost ideal approximation to O(n log n). The L1 part is even better then O(1), which is curious in itself. So please excuse me if i'm a bit sarcastic about the "groundbreaking" insights. "Myth of RAM" seems like an attention grabbing caption, and i couldn't help to comment in an according way. No insult or harm ever meant. If perceived as such i do apologize.