4 ms·
Rather fun read, I must say. It really seems like it makes sense that browsers really "need" the bloat; it has got to the point where it ends up being the most
by rbisewski 10y ago
Rather fun read, I must say.
It really seems like it makes sense that browsers really "need" the bloat; it has got to the point where it ends up being the most useful and most used application on any OS, for a given section of the end-user base, anyway.
At that point can we really call those features bloat? Maybe in 1996 you didn't need to play videos much, but a web browser without HTML 5 can't do what the majority would expect. What users expect from the internet has very much expanded.
I actually was curious about some of the inner workings of this stuff and made a browser using WebKit once.
https://gitlab.com/ibiscybernetics/sighte https://gitlab.com/ibiscybernetics/sighte
All-in-all one of the more unusual side projects I played with.
- digi_owl 10y ago> It really seems like it makes sense that browsers really "need" the bloat; it has got to the point where it ends up being the most useful and most used application on any OS, for a given section of the end-user base, anyway. Effectively the browser has in the GUI age become what the terminal emulator was in the CLI age. On its own the browser do jack all. But it allows remote resources to present a local UI. Thus my lowly desktop PC can become a virtual supercomputer.