3 ms·

Here's the state of things as far as AI-written films: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY7x2Ihqjmc&ab_channel=ArsTechnicaVideos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v

• ythl 10y ago
  Generating a screenplay from a bunch of existing screenplays is about as good as generating a poem from a bunch of existing poems. I think there was a story the other day showcasing AI-generated poems, and all of them pretty much sucked. They might be able to pass as "modern art", but they were a far cry from poems like "O Captain, My Captain" or "The Highwayman".
  • readams 10y ago
    Generating poems from a bunch of existing poems is pretty much what humans do also. Art is very derivative, and necessarily so.
  • binalpatel 10y ago
    Humans do exactly that though - an artist isn't born in a vacuum.
    • bjt 10y ago
      > Humans do exactly that though There's a weak and a strong version of that claim. To say that humans use existing works in creating their own is easily provable. But what I don't think is easily provable is that the new work is entirely the product of existing works, with the brain contributing nothing new beyond an AI-like algorithm.
      • andrewflnr 10y ago
        Humans also have another pretty large corpus of input data: their entire life experiences.
  • TrevorJ 10y ago
    To be clear, I'm not saying this example is good. (Unless you particularly enjoy absurdism).