3 ms·
My thoughts on e-voting have changed as I've grown older. In high school and college I said technology is the future! It's insane that we're still using paper
by joshfraser 10y ago
My thoughts on e-voting have changed as I've grown older.
In high school and college I said technology is the future! It's insane that we're still using paper and pencil for something so important. Computers are better at counting than humans. Yay e-voting!
Then I realized that you can't trust individual company or organization with that much power & any trusted e-voting software would have to be open source so that it could be independently verified by security experts everywhere.
Then I learned more about how many 0-day vulnerabilities exist and are being stock-piled by state actors for every layer of the stack -- routers, firmware, operating systems, browsers, popular code libraries, etc. It's all been compromised. You can't trust any of it. So you'd have to open-source the hardware too & probably keep the whole thing air-gapped from the internet. And still that might not be enough!
Today I believe there's no way to secure a system (electronic or not) without publishing a log of every vote cast. This gets tricky when you have secret ballots, but there are a couple ways to handle it. The first way would to be to allow people to choose whether they want their ballot to be public or private. That way you'd end up with enough public votes that you should be able to tell whether the election was massively rigged or not (assuming you expect the private votes to follow the same distribution as the public ones). The second option would be to assign everyone a private one-time key when they vote -- a receipt they can look up later. Everyone can then look up the key from their voting receipt on the public log and make sure their vote was tallied correctly. The second option has the benefit of keeping secret ballots, but you'd need a separate way to verify that the number of lines in the public log is the same as the number of people who showed up to vote. That can be solved by publishing a list of who showed up to vote.
Of course, we can't know for sure that we've had a fair election while the NSA dragnet continues to exist. We would never know which candidates were forced to drop out from those in power using their access to surveillance intel to blackmail a candidate or leak their dirty secrets to the press.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoDon't assume that the private votes follow the same pattern as the public votes. When you have an election where there is public shaming of people voting for one side, even exit polls are off. For example, in the "should Scotland leave Great Britain" referendum, there was a lot of public pressure for voting to leave. Those who voted to remain were much more quiet, but in the end, they were the majority. I was actually in vacation just before the vote. Even as an outsider, I could tell that the leave faction was much more vocal, but the remain faction was quietly solid.