4 ms·

> There are promising fusion approaches that are closer to achieving net energy While I agree there should be more funding for non-tokomak projects, this is si

> There are promising fusion approaches that are closer to achieving net energy While I agree there should be more funding for non-tokomak projects, this is simply not true. JET has reached 70% of breakeven and JT60 in Japan reached "theoretical" breakeven (if it had tritium). Nothing else has ever gotten close.

ZenoArrow 10y ago
> "Nothing else has ever gotten close." The following is taken from an article published on June 2016... http://lppfusion.com/git-12-z-pinch-achieves-6-joule-fusion-output-with-deuterium-fuel/ http://lppfusion.com/git-12-z-pinch-achieves-6-joule-fusion-... "GIT-12 Z-Pinch Achieves 6 Joule Fusion Output with Deuterium Fuel" "Z-pinch devices are closely related to plasma focus devices in that they also use the currents through the plasma itself, not external magnets, to produce the strong magnetic forces that confine hot plasma. In a z-pinch, however, the current flows between two electrodes in a line, rather than the plasma focus’s concentric electrodes. At the Prague conference, Russian and Eastern European physicists announced new experiments with the powerful GIT-12 z-pinch. They used a configuration in which the plasma was arranged in two concentric rings, puffed into the gap between the electrodes right before the discharge. Nearly 6 J of fusion energy (producing 6×1012 neutrons) were released with a 3 MA current and 3 MJ of input energy to the device. Since only 500 kJ of energy was released from the capacitor bank prior to the pinch, the ratio of 1.2 J of fusion per 100 kJ of input rivaled or slightly surpassed the best results obtained in either plasma focus devices or tokamaks, both of which are close to 1 J per 100 KJ input." The implication is that both Z-Pinch and DPF devices are close to tokamaks in terms of energy efficiency, based on the experiments performed to date. Do you disagree with this? If so, why?
- drjesusphd 10y ago
  Yes, I disagree. They really should show their work that tokomaks have results as poor as: > 1.2 J of fusion per 100 kJ That's a "Q" value of 0.00001. Tokamaks have reached Q=0.7.

ZenoArrow 10y ago

> "Nothing else has ever gotten close." The following is taken from an article published on June 2016... http://lppfusion.com/git-12-z-pinch-achieves-6-joule-fusion-output-with-deuterium-fuel/ http://lppfusion.com/git-12-z-pinch-achieves-6-joule-fusion-... "GIT-12 Z-Pinch Achieves 6 Joule Fusion Output with Deuterium Fuel" "Z-pinch devices are closely related to plasma focus devices in that they also use the currents through the plasma itself, not external magnets, to produce the strong magnetic forces that confine hot plasma. In a z-pinch, however, the current flows between two electrodes in a line, rather than the plasma focus’s concentric electrodes. At the Prague conference, Russian and Eastern European physicists announced new experiments with the powerful GIT-12 z-pinch. They used a configuration in which the plasma was arranged in two concentric rings, puffed into the gap between the electrodes right before the discharge. Nearly 6 J of fusion energy (producing 6×1012 neutrons) were released with a 3 MA current and 3 MJ of input energy to the device. Since only 500 kJ of energy was released from the capacitor bank prior to the pinch, the ratio of 1.2 J of fusion per 100 kJ of input rivaled or slightly surpassed the best results obtained in either plasma focus devices or tokamaks, both of which are close to 1 J per 100 KJ input." The implication is that both Z-Pinch and DPF devices are close to tokamaks in terms of energy efficiency, based on the experiments performed to date. Do you disagree with this? If so, why?

drjesusphd 10y ago
Yes, I disagree. They really should show their work that tokomaks have results as poor as: > 1.2 J of fusion per 100 kJ That's a "Q" value of 0.00001. Tokamaks have reached Q=0.7.