3 ms·
HUMINT is much more resource intensive than SIGINT. Paper voting is much more secure for persons than e-voting / polling. Blockchains are more easily conduciv
by dev1n 10y ago
HUMINT is much more resource intensive than SIGINT. Paper voting is much more secure for persons than e-voting / polling.
Blockchains are more easily conducive to side-channel attacks at revealing who a person voted for than paper voting is.
- Mtinie 10y agoI don't disagree you. I'm not aware of a production-grade blockchain voting protocol that yet exists that is resilient against one or more of the currently known de-anonymization attacks. I'm not even sure it's possible to build one, given that humans are a portion of the workflow. On the other hand, I'd love to be proven wrong.