6 ms·
Unfortunately, it's not going to work, and they will be ran out of business through the political will of the people, just as the tobacco industry is now having
by IsaacL 10y ago
Unfortunately, it's not going to work, and they will be ran out of business through the political will of the people, just as the tobacco industry is now having done to it.
Cool, and what's your proposal for an alternative energy source to power modern civilisation?
https://www.scribd.com/document/320110894/Alex-Epstein-Moral-Case-for-Fossil-Fuels-Summary https://www.scribd.com/document/320110894/Alex-Epstein-Moral...
- marcoperaza 10y agoHow about nuclear power? It's the most viable energy source that we have. It doesn't emit carbon. It could power the world. Funny that the people who get labeled "climate deniers" are also the most pro-nuclear, while the loud environmentalists are the most anti-nuclear. I frankly don't give a damn what they believe or don't believe, if they're going to solve the problem anyway.
- xxpor 10y agoPutting a nuclear reactor in every car and truck sounds like a great idea!
- marcoperaza 10y ago1. If fossil fuel use is reduced to cars/trucks, the problem is largely solved. In the US, only 26% of emissions come from transportation.[1] 2. Electric cars will make this irrelevant, since they'll draw their power from the grid. In the meantime, ICEs/hybrids are becoming increasingly efficient. [1] https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emis...
- IsaacL 10y agoYes, fossil fuels, nuclear or hydro are the 3 feasible options. Long-term, investing in safer nuclear power is the way forward.
- fma 10y agoNuclear would solve a lot of problem if we are able to overcome power transmission issue. Not everyone wants a nuclear power plant anywhere near them. But oil would still be used for plastics, transportation (airplanes, tankers), heating, etc...
- ocschwar 10y ago"Cool, and what's your proposal for an alternative energy source to power modern civilisation?" We have several alternatives. The only problem they have is that most of them are difficult to store in a self-contained moving vehicle that turns rubber wheels to move on flat blacktop. So, we increase reliance on vehicles that turn steel wheels on steel tracks, and get their power from overhead wires. Next question?
- 4ad 10y agoMost of the electrical energy comes from burning things that create carbon-dioxide as a side product. The only real alternative is fission, and the public opinion against nuclear is even worse than against oil. How do you solve this problem? Getting people and things moved by train is a great idea, but in the grand scheme of things we're dependant on oil for so many other things.
- ianai 10y agoRecreate the nuclear industry.
- Retric 10y agoWell over 40% of US electricity comes from things that don't create carbon dioxide. Exact numbers are hard to come by because a lot of solar power for example never ends up on the electric grid.
- 4ad 10y agoI know this is very hard for this forum to consider at times, but the world is not only the US, and the question about what do with coal, oil, and gas is a global, not a US problem. United States is a somewhat lucky outlier when it comes to energy production. Unfortunately, even in other currently lucky nations, the public sentiment is strongly against nuclear power. In 2013 91.6% of the energy cames from CO2 producing sources[1], and nuclear production is decreasing[1], having peaked in 2005. The exact percentage, whether it's 91.5% or under 60% doesn't even matter though, what matters is that fossil fuel burning is increasing in absolute terms[1]. [1] http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld_Statistics_2015.pdf http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication...