> ...this idea that there is definitely no paradox... Yes, it depends on what one means by "there are", ones own perspective or a much more abstract take, whic

> ...this idea that there is definitely no paradox... Yes, it depends on what one means by "there are", ones own perspective or a much more abstract take, which I wrote somewhere else earlier: > Whenever you have a paradox, like wave-particle duality - but also the "French paradox" > in nutrition, it's not because there really is a "paradox" in the universe, it's because > the way you look at it is too limited, and if you find a better view you will see there > is no paradox. Since you, especially as a human being, can't look at a phenomenon without having a point of view (models) paradoxes are real are not real - at the same time, depending on your models. I claim there always is a (higher) POV where there is no paradox.