The authors' of the paper feel it is being misinterpreted and tried to submit errata to PNAS:[1] They tried to change the following sentence: “These results q

The authors' of the paper feel it is being misinterpreted and tried to submit errata to PNAS:[1] They tried to change the following sentence: “These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of neuroimaging results.” To “These results question the validity of a number of fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of weakly significant neuroimaging results.” Link to discussion in /r/NeuroScience: https://www.reddit.com/r/neuroscience/comments/4ri72b/the_software_for_fmri_analysis_results_in/ https://www.reddit.com/r/neuroscience/comments/4ri72b/the_so... [1] http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/nichols/entry/errata_for_cluster/ http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/nichols/entry/errata_for_cluster/