4 ms·
Not really a problem here as most of science still seems to be using Python 2. edit: Cython was always great for Python 2 and apparently supports 3. http://cyt
by njbooher 10y ago
Not really a problem here as most of science still seems to be using Python 2.
edit: Cython was always great for Python 2 and apparently supports 3. http://cython.org http://cython.org
- ericfrederich 10y agoYeah. I came across C library that used Cython to create Python bindings. It was funny, they could easily support both Python 2 and Python 3 at the same time since all their binding code was in Cython, it was only their installation script witch used an incompatibility (print statement)
- brian_herman 10y agoWhat was the library?
- shoyer 10y agoNumba also supports Python 3.