>The only thing Facebook has done that the author seems to object to is to be extraordinarily, unprecedentedly successful. Where does he say that? You just de

>The only thing Facebook has done that the author seems to object to is to be extraordinarily, unprecedentedly successful. Where does he say that? You just described an open web and then somehow attributed all of that to Facebook. If Facebook were to replace the Internet like Zuckerberg would love to do then none of the things you described would still be possible. >There are a lot of things I find toxic about Facebook Sir Tim and I agree with you on that.