4 ms·
> They more or less ignored the file sync issue of Docker for Mac Which particular problem? The crappy performance/CPU usage one(s), or something else? Having
by shabble 10y ago
> They more or less ignored the file sync issue of Docker for Mac
Which particular problem? The crappy performance/CPU usage one(s), or something else? Having used various different approaches (docker in vmware linux/virtualbox), the d4m (osxfs?) one seemed to be the least broken for general dev stuff.
Hopefully not more issues I need to keep a lookout for.
- hosh 10y agoCrappy performance related to the osxfs --latency issues for writes for host volumes. It's getting closer to the latency as Docker for Linux. (I hear though, workarounds like using unisonfs and fswatch works all right) There is also the bit about host networking. Since Docker for Mac runs a transparent Linux, the host networking goes there instead. That thread ended up in a big, roaring silence.