4 ms·
Why without math?
by argv_empty 17y ago
Why without math?
- henning 17y agoCorrectly describing electromagnetics involves invoking vector calculus, which is a tall order for 10 year old children even in education systems more rigorous than America's.
- DaniFong 17y agoYou don't need vector calculus. My demonstration of the power factor is a children's swing: if you push against your friend as they travel out you do work on them: if you make contact with your friend aas they're coming back, they do work on you. Kids have a pretty good mechanical model of swing sets.
- vitaminj 17y agoDo kids actually learn about power factor? That point aside, while an intuitive understanding is nice, power factor is really a mathematical construct arising from the multiplication of two out-of-phase sinusoids (i.e. voltage and current). I think to really understand active / reactive power and pf, you need to look at the maths. It's really not that difficult. And you certainly don't need to know vector calculus, merely high school trig.
- argv_empty 17y agoFully describing it, yes, but a 6th grader should at least be able to handle Ohm's law >_>
- afterburner 17y agoWhat about pictures and animations of those vectors? They don't have to perform operations on those vectors to start understanding, they just have to see the vectors. In other words, they have to see pictures of arrows.