5 ms·
Admittedly I don't have a lot of context, but the only allegation I see here of actual unethical behavior on Udemy's part is that one embedded tweet which claim
by ameliaquining 10y ago
Admittedly I don't have a lot of context, but the only allegation I see here of actual unethical behavior on Udemy's part is that one embedded tweet which claims that they don't respond in a timely manner to DMCA takedown notices. I think that if they want to be a free-for-all platform without human review like YouTube rather than a curated one like Pluralsight, that's their prerogative; there's room for both in the marketplace and consumers have plenty of choice. And if they're a free-for-all platform, they don't have an obligation to proactively police user-uploaded content for copyright infringement, only to respond to DMCA notices.
- makomk 10y agoThe DMCA safe harbour doesn't protect companies who sell copyright-infringing content as Udacity is doing.
- Noseshine 10y ago> Udacity What?
- BerislavLopac 10y agohttps://www.udacity.com/ https://www.udacity.com/
- Noseshine 10y agoThe question is why Udacity - it is not named anywhere! You didn't actually READ the article either, but you downvote people who did? Great job.
- BerislavLopac 10y agoMight be a simple confusion by the author; the sites have similar names and server similar functions. Edit: Sorry, who downvoted whom? :-o
- Noseshine 10y agoWhich is what I pointed out! So what's the point of your response to my question? Again: Udacity is not involved at all!
- BerislavLopac 10y agoSorry, but your post wasn't pointing out anything, it was just a single question which could be interpreted in many ways. I interpreted it as your confusion over what Udacity is and tried to help.
- Noseshine 10y agoOnly someone who didn't read the article could misinterpret my comment. > and tried to help. That is probably even true! As I said in my previous reply, YOU SHOULD HAVE READ THE ARTICLE! People like you writing comments without knowing the topic - the bane of Internet discussions.
- BerislavLopac 10y agoWhy do you keep saying saying that? My comment has had nothing to do with the article itself, it was simply intended to answer what I interpreted as a confusion in the comment.
- Noseshine 10y agoAs I already said, only an asshole like yourself that didn't read the article could misinterpret my comment. I get it that some people have trouble admitting they are wrong, but you take cognitive dissonance to new heights. I bet you still didn't read the article, because you could not care less about the topics. You just want to "participate". You poor, poor little man.
- jlgaddis 10y ago> You poor, poor little man. Says one of the two participants of a pointless Internet argument that no one else cares about (as is evident by all of the downvotes in this exchange). How's that saying go? "Arguing on the Internet ... you're still retarded"?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]