4 ms·
You're going backwards. We already did the "per capita" thing, now you're pretending that you didn't understand what "large" meant in the first place? I see th
by S_Daedalus 10y ago
You're going backwards. We already did the "per capita" thing, now you're pretending that you didn't understand what "large" meant in the first place?
I see that you have some kind of problem with what's been said about the production of great mathematical minds in Russia, so why don't you offer something contrary to the assertions made so far? Rhetorical gaming is really not an effective tool to make your point.
- gaius 10y agoYou said: shockingly few when you consider how large the country their working with is I replied that the country isn't actually that large in terms of people, so your point is invalid. Now you seem to be saying that empty land should produce more mathematicians. Also, it's "they're".