6 ms·
And in the next paragraph "To counteract this [sending of power to the wheel of least resistance] , the better AWD cars are fitted with a center differential th
by sunstone 10y ago
And in the next paragraph "To counteract this [sending of power to the wheel of least resistance] , the better AWD cars are fitted with a center differential that contains a clutch or viscous drive unit. This splits torque front-to-rear, directing it away from the spinning wheel. "
So, a well engineered AWD system actually sends power away from the slipping wheel(s) and towards the wheels with traction, which makes more sense.
- Mikeb85 10y agoWell both tactics work in different scenarios. When power goes to the slipping wheels, it helps keep the car drive strait. For example, in the rain or light snow. If one wheel slips, then suddenly power goes to the wheel with traction, you'll veer off-course. When it goes to the wheels with traction, it helps get the car un-stuck. This is usually what you want when you're doing serious off-roading, stuck in snow, etc... Also, in this scenario you're usually going very slowly/not moving, so the sudden change of direction won't be a problem. Modern AWD does a bit of both - it'll send power to wheels with traction, but will also compensate by sending power to a wheel on the other side of the car. For example, if there's no traction on your left front tire, it'll send power to your right front tire and left rear tire, and reduce power on your right rear tire to keep you going strait.
- andrewstuart2 10y agoWell, not quite; the viscous drive unit really just ensures that every path has some resistance floor, and thus that not all torque goes to one wheel. At one point I remember there was a workaround mentioned by the Hummer engineers (I believe) to apply the brake simultaneously with the gas if you ran into the "one wheel spinning in the air" problem. This is a simply a manual application of the same physical solution of creating at least some resistance everywhere.
- NickNameNick 10y agoThe trick with the hummers was slightly different. Hummers have torsen diffs, which have a pair of worm gears where a conventional open diff would have single star gear. As a result, the torsen diff sends some fixed multiple (changes with model) of the torque used by the easier to spin side, to the harder to spin side. Of course if one wheel is spinning in air, the easy side uses effectively 0 torque, and 0 times anything is still 0, hence the brakes. Applying the brakes increases the torque requirement of all wheels by a fixed amount, but the hard to spin wheels get More than that amount of extra torque.
- tombrossman 10y agoThat's right. A poorly-engineered 4WD system means you are stuck on a hill because one wheel is on slippery wet leaves. AWD should mean you can get up that hill with three wheels on slippery wet leaves, and one with grip. That's the simplest explanation. I had an old Toyota Tercel 4WD station wagon and it was very difficult to steer sharply at low speed with 4WD engaged because of the lack of a differential. It would lurch and I had to press harder of the accelerator to get straightened out and pop it back into 2WD. It was my first car so I didn't know any better. Fun fact: In 4WD, you got an 'extra low' gear below 1st and that car could very nearly climb trees. The gear ratio was insane. No ground clearance but I used to scare the crap out of friends by going up very steep inclines in extra low gear with 4WD engaged. They would have to park their pickup trucks at the bottom of the hill and ride with me, and this caused them some embarrassment. Good times.
- alanning 10y agoI loved my old Tercel wagon. Didn't use that low gear all that often but fun to have. CV joints were always my problem, ended up having to replace them quite often. One time in college I was turning too sharply while parking and the axle actually popped out of the right front. Loose axle would just spin in 2WD but switching to 4WD enabled me to make it to the nearby Mech E. building and get help. :)
- icantdrive55 10y agoI gave a 89 Toyota that kinda took care of, with 240,000 miles. She still has 125 psi in the cylinders. Changed the oil when I felt like it. Changed the oil filter only sometimes. Never changed the air filter. Never repaired a tapping valve. In other words, didn't take care of her like other vechicles I owned. One day, I think, even 80's and 90's Toyotas will be collectors items. I know some of them are collectors vechicles now, but I feel the 80's to 90's vechicles will see a huge boost in interest.
- madengr 10y agoI had an 87 pickup and 87 tercel. The engines will last forever, but rust is the killer on the truck. Currently have a 2005 Tacoma and it is rust free (plastic wheel wells) but even it has a recall for rusty suspension.
- gens 10y agoA well engineered differential [0]. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEiSTzK-A2A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEiSTzK-A2A
- taneq 10y agoEveryone's focusing on the technology involved, but that's kind of pointless because AWD isn't a technical term. It's a term to distinguish an on-road car with four driven wheels from an all-terrain car, because when the first WRXes and such came out, people saw 4WD and thought that meant they could be used to go bush bashing.
- avn2109 10y ago>> "...sends power away from the slipping wheel(s)..." Exactly this. The best ones are entirely mechanical, without any fancy computers or even viscous couplings. Audi sold (sells?) IMHO the most sophisticated AWD system on the market, which uses a system of crossed helical gears to continuously and instantaneously redistribute torque proportionally to wheel traction, up to a roughly 80-20 split. There are no computers and the whole thing is mechanical. The differential is a minor mechanical miracle sold under the trade name Torsen, short for "torque sensing." Despite Audi's German-engineering themed marketing, the differential was actually designed by an American. In the 80's, the station wagons even had a manually-actuated center locker, which was eventually replaced by a servomoter driven locker. I don't know what the new ones have.
- joushou 10y agoAudi Quattro is great, although IIRC, it also eats a bit tires on tight turns like anything but an open diff would. I also like the viscous clutch on the jeep, although it definitely is less on-road friendly (A tight 90 degree turn is enough to hear the tires, 180 and you can almost feel the car get lower). My worst system was my 98 explorer - it engages the clutch completely when front axle falls behind, waits a second, disengages to check if axle is still behind, if so, reengages... It's jumpy as hell when turning, and sucked no matter what. You could mod it for pure 2WD operation by switch, but stock was awful. However, I don't think you should underestimate electric systems. I mean, I hate car software with a passion, but when they work, they actually have really good characteristics. Things like LSD's where the pump is electrically enabled give quite smooth transitions, and can simulate the response of both on and offroad mechanic systems. Response time is also nearly instant. If car computers weren't bloody black boxes (or at least leave only important things to the black box!), these systems often end up being much simpler than their purely mechanic black voodoo counterparts.
- markdown 10y agoIn the famous Saudi videos (there are hundreds of them), the wheels that lose traction completely stop. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQm5BnhTBEQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQm5BnhTBEQ