4 ms·

> There needs to be an objective overseer, that is not profit-driven, for proper evaluation. This Muddy Waters-MedSec fiasco is evoking memories of the Wild Wes

> There needs to be an objective overseer, that is not profit-driven, for proper evaluation. This Muddy Waters-MedSec fiasco is evoking memories of the Wild West and is surely not where we want to end up. So, another Federal bureaucracy? Or what? And how could you guarantee that such a body would remain objective, and avoid regulatory capture? I think the solution you propose could easily be worse than the problem.

armitron 10y ago
It doesn't have to be a Federal Bureaucracy. Consumer Reports is one example. Mudge _already doing_ it in the cybersecurity domain is another.
- twblalock 10y ago
  But nobody is required to go though organizations like these when they demonstrate flaws. Why would they start doing that?