5 ms·
Seems like it would give a large performance penalty. I don't get it.
by mighty_atomic_c 10y ago
Seems like it would give a large performance penalty. I don't get it.
- detaro 10y agoIt's a joke/demonstration that it is possible, not something you're supposed to use.
- posterboy 10y agoObfuscation is surely used in malware. One instruction set computers (OISC) are more than a joke, I suppose, but I didn't dig far into theoretical computer science and can't say, what's important about them. I read a comment the other day, that stipulated neurons would be akin to massively parallel single instruction computers.
- stcredzero 10y agoOne instruction set computers (OISC) are more than a joke, I suppose, but I didn't dig far into theoretical computer science and can't say, what's important about them. They're for highly parallel programable SIMD number crunching. The OISC would allow for easily fabricating a whole heaping bunch of ALUs.
- hulahoof 10y agoThere is a good talk that accompanies the code
- caretStick 10y agosource?
- hulahoof 10y agoyoutube.com/watch?v=HlUe0TUHOIc At about 7 minutes in he is chatting about it but all is a good watch - could only find the YT link sorry