3 ms·
That doesn't really disprove the point though. Probably the vast majority of startups have a dominant cofounder. You might call them cofounders-in-name-only, b
by morgante 10y ago
That doesn't really disprove the point though.
Probably the vast majority of startups have a dominant cofounder. You might call them cofounders-in-name-only, but that still validates the notion that you're better off finding a cofounder (even if they're not as central).
- sportanova 10y agoYeah it's just another perspective I don't think it validates it - if their not as central why not make them an employee with less equity / control