5 ms·
Agreed. I wish Eric didnt repeat so much of what he's already said. Repetition in an age of infinite content availability is unnecessary. But if scoble had hea
by jamesshamenski 17y ago
Agreed. I wish Eric didnt repeat so much of what he's already said. Repetition in an age of infinite content availability is unnecessary.
But if scoble had heard his other interviews, i doubt he would have been as surprised or asked those questions. Scoble is great but sometimes like all journalists he can forget to 'know his audience'. And for each of his interviews, he shares the audience with the interviewee.
- eries 17y agoI appreciate the feedback. I find it hard to balance between introducing a new audience to the material and having something new for people who follow online. I love this quote: "Repetition in an age of infinite content availability is unnecessary." I'm just wondering how to cope with it; infinite availability is not the same as infinite attention. Always open to suggestions, Eric
- ableal 17y agoWell, I was taught to: 1) Tell them what you're going to tell 2) Tell them 3) Tell them what you told Didn't quite take ;-)
- derefr 17y agoWhenever you have a thought that merits a good chunk of discussion, give that thought a name. In everything you say after that, don't rephrase your previous discussion, just reference the name—it's a verbal #include. In a textual medium, of course, every name-drop can just be hyperlinked to the previous discussion.
- TheSOB88 17y agoDon't repeat yourself to computers. DO repeat yourself to people. http://breckyunits.com/with_computers_dont_repeat_yourself_with_people_do_repeat_yourself http://breckyunits.com/with_computers_dont_repeat_yourself_w...
- dnsworks 17y agoHe's not repeating himself, he's just being Lean!