3 ms·
So, you're the intellectual authority on politics then, capable of declaring with certainty that Noam's ideas in that arena are flawed?
by dbingham 10y ago
So, you're the intellectual authority on politics then, capable of declaring with certainty that Noam's ideas in that arena are flawed?
- Kenji 10y agoAs you may have noticed, I precisely did not go into any details about Chomsky's politics because I know how the large majority of HN thinks and it's pretty much useless to reason about this here. The fact that his political ideas are barely backed up with data speaks for itself. If you look at what he writes, it is obvious that his view on history is strongly influenced by the lens of his ideology. This is very unlike his work on grammars, which I greatly appreciate. That is all I'm going to say about this. Judge for yourself.
- wry_discontent 10y agoFrom what I've read, his politics are extremely well cited, and he appears to have facts on hand to support all the claims he makes.
- Synaesthesia 10y agoDo you have any specific criticism in mind of anything he's said?
- abalone 10y ago> The fact that his political ideas are barely backed up with data speaks for itself. This is an objectively ridiculous assertion. His works are extensively cited with primary sources. He regularly has hundreds of footnotes per book. Manufacturing Consent and Necessary Illusions are just two examples of a scientific, ideology-free approach to political analysis. There he compares and contrasts how the U.S. media covers similar international events -- by state friends vs. foes -- and it is quite damning.
- piokuc 10y agoChomsky's political writing is actually backed by tons of data (facts). He is clear about his ideology and does not try to hide it,but facts his quoting are facts.