> So you believe that 'trigger warning' advocates support the University of Chicago decision then, by not having a formal rule in place in regards to them? Pol

> So you believe that 'trigger warning' advocates support the University of Chicago decision then, by not having a formal rule in place in regards to them? Policy isn't law, by definition. "Hey, we'd really like our employees to be relatively tactful when they bring up things that are very likely to upset some of our students due to their experiences" wouldn't be very hard to say.