3 ms·

“Just use X” · For values of X including Hjson, Amazon Ion, edn, Transit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way richer than JSON, often w

by fiatjaf 10y ago

“Just use X” · For values of X including Hjson, Amazon Ion, edn, Transit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way richer than JSON, often with fully-worked-out type systems and Conceptual Tutorials and so on. What? MOST OF THEM? YAML is not, Hjson is not, TOML is not.

gengkev 10y ago
YAML... really? Looking at the examples in the Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML) gives me a headache. Fortunately, most actual YAML files I've seen are not that complicated.
- fiatjaf 10y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON#YAML_sample https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON#YAML_sample

“Just use X” · For val­ues of X in­clud­ing Hj­son, Ama­zon Ion, edn, Tran­sit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way rich­er than JSON, of­ten w

“Just use X” · For val­ues of X in­clud­ing Hj­son, Ama­zon Ion, edn, Tran­sit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way rich­er than JSON, of­ten w

“Just use X” · For values of X including Hjson, Amazon Ion, edn, Transit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way richer than JSON, often w

“Just use X” · For values of X including Hjson, Amazon Ion, edn, Transit, YAML, and TOML. ¶ Nah, most of them are way, way richer than JSON, often w