3 ms·

Hm, I don’t think so. It just doesn’t have enough momentum and as such there aren’t many containers available. Of course, if you want to roll your own, that may

by fuzzy2 10y ago

Hm, I don’t think so. It just doesn’t have enough momentum and as such there aren’t many containers available. Of course, if you want to roll your own, that may not be relevant. I tried it with the nginx and php-fpm Docker containers, but it wouldn’t work – because those containers assume specific process hierarchies (to log to the console where you issued `docker run`) that just aren’t present when using rkt. The advertised Docker compatibility only goes so far. I still think rkt is a great idea, but I’m too lazy to develop my own containers. The documentation isn’t that good either.

sjellis 10y ago
To be fair, you really have to roll your own containers for applications, and it's not hard at all, if you already know how the applications are hosted are on a Linux server. I've found the single-service Docker containers from the Hub are useful for development (MySQL, Redis, etc.), but the "official" language run-time Docker containers that I've looked at are basically demoware. They are built to give you something that runs with the minimum of effort, rather than being efficient or anything else.
cookiecaper 10y ago
They need to implement support for the Dockerfile format if they want to win. People value inertia. The switching costs have to be low if you expect anyone to switch; this only become non-true when the incumbent becomes intolerably useless to the general userbase.
- philips 10y ago
  rkt can run any docker image built by a Dockerfile: https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/running-docker-images.html https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/running-docker-images.htm... I agree that we need a better ecosystem of build tools and that is something we are looking to help build out. But, with rkt what we are trying to do is build an excellent runtime; and think the build side is an important and orthogonal problem.

by fuzzy2 10y ago

sjellis 10y ago

To be fair, you really have to roll your own containers for applications, and it's not hard at all, if you already know how the applications are hosted are on a Linux server. I've found the single-service Docker containers from the Hub are useful for development (MySQL, Redis, etc.), but the "official" language run-time Docker containers that I've looked at are basically demoware. They are built to give you something that runs with the minimum of effort, rather than being efficient or anything else.

cookiecaper 10y ago

They need to implement support for the Dockerfile format if they want to win. People value inertia. The switching costs have to be low if you expect anyone to switch; this only become non-true when the incumbent becomes intolerably useless to the general userbase.

philips 10y ago
rkt can run any docker image built by a Dockerfile: https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/running-docker-images.html https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/running-docker-images.htm... I agree that we need a better ecosystem of build tools and that is something we are looking to help build out. But, with rkt what we are trying to do is build an excellent runtime; and think the build side is an important and orthogonal problem.