Opinions here are my own. > It nothing about that. The main point is the whole community bitching a moaning about software that in all intent and purposes is g

Opinions here are my own. > It nothing about that. The main point is the whole community bitching a moaning about software that in all intent and purposes is given away free > without any contribution by the users. I remember that Jessie did a talk where she said that something like 4/5 contributions to Docker are from people who don't work for Docker Inc. I was one of them (I spend most of my time contributing to runC now because there's less politics there). So your point is categorically invalid. > The source code of Docker is open source so why doesn't the guy go in there and contribute his time and or his own money to support the project that to him is so vital? Docker Inc does not operate Docker like a community project. Maintainers are elected behind closed doors, most of the maintainers work for Docker Inc, Docker Inc has a roadmap that the community does not have access to, maintainers of Docker will not merge code if it is not strictly inline with Docker Inc's roadmap, they openly attack distributions like RedHat and openSUSE for applying out-of-tree patches to Docker. > No doubt the guys working on Docker are super smart guys The community is also fairly clever too, especially considering that we outnumber the number of people working for Docker Inc.