4 ms·
I use slack in irssi. I think I actually get better benefits. 1. irssi is ridiculously low resource usage. It never melts down. 2. No notifications by defau
by mikekchar 10y ago
I use slack in irssi. I think I actually get better benefits.
1. irssi is ridiculously low resource usage. It never melts down.
2. No notifications by default. I actually have a script that gives me notifications. It's quite cool because I filter the messages by regexp so that I only see what I want to see. Also, it uses my normal desktop notifications which means that they show up where I want them to, with the right font, in the right colour, lasting for the time I want them to. One tip: my default notifications do not stay up long enough to read them. It just gives me an indication that people are talking. I can notice a word or two and if it strikes my interest I can go to irssi and see what they are talking about.
3. I'm a programmer, so I'm always in my console. Same sauce, different flavour ;-)
I occasionally use slack from the browser because it has some features which are useful (like showing images), but I do that only on demand.
One of the things that is useful is that the people who like using slack on my team also have a lot of experience with IRC. They have good etiquette. Chatter is kept in the right channels so that it can be ignored easily. Work channels are about work and have a really high signal to noise ratio. Some teams are so good at it that if I want to get an overview of what's going on in their project I can simply subscribe to their slack channel. It's great for me since I work remote.
- edibleEnergy 10y agoAnother couple great things about slack over irc (I use irssi as well): 1. Text logs that you can grep. I've probably grepped dozens of times for ip addresses, conversations where I know i mentioned someone or they mentioned me, etc. 2. No deletes or edits, once it's been sent to your client there is no mechanism to retract it like there is in the browser or native client.
- solipsism 10y agoWhy is 2 a plus? It was deleted/edited for a reason. It's like going through someone's trash.
- iamdave 10y agoThis assumes all edits and deletions are done in good faith or that there wouldn't be legitimate need for persistent chat logs for auditing (chat support for instance).
- solipsism 10y agoSlack group administrators can see edit history. That's not relevant, we're talking about what end users see.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoStill doesn't make edits/deletes a feature. When you say something, the information leaves your control. You should not be able to retroactively edit/retract it. It's mine now.
- solipsism 10y agoWhy? Give a good reason for this being the case? I realize lots of people have that feeling, but no one I've encountered can back it up. It feels like the "git history should never be modified!" fundamentalists. Pragmatism always wins out in the end. In practice the editing feature is not a problem. The pros outweigh any cons. Point me to the groups of people talking about the disasters that ensued once they allowed editing?
- TeMPOraL 10y agoAs a principle of communication. Working on a git repo is working on a shared artifact that's external to you and other developers. Retroactively deleting a message you sent me is literally like reaching out into my inbox and yanking out something that's mine now. Feels a bit different.
- solipsism 10y agoYes. Very principled. I'm telling you that in practice, for the multiple large teams I've been a part of that have switched to slack, violating that principle doesn't prove to lead to problems. The benefits dominate the theoretical, academic concern. Try it!