3 ms·
I don't think it's a bad thing. Ruby 1.9.1 needs to go. There are a number of bugs and quirks in 1.9.1 which have been fixed in 1.9.2. E.g. while developing Phu
by FooBarWidget 17y ago
I don't think it's a bad thing. Ruby 1.9.1 needs to go. There are a number of bugs and quirks in 1.9.1 which have been fixed in 1.9.2. E.g. while developing Phusion Passenger I've noticed some VM deadlock bugs, all of which are now fixed.
- _pius 17y agoRuby 1.9.1 needs to go. I agree, but I don't think Ruby 1.9.2 is slated for release until the end of August.
- sailormoon 17y agoWell, that's less than 3 months away. Not so bad. 1.9.2 release plan, for those who missed it: - 31 Mar. freeze the spec - 30 Apr. freeze the code - 31 May. release 1.9.2-preview2 - 30 Jun. release 1.9.2-rc - 31 Jul. release 1.9.2-p0